When you think of brands you trust, what comes to mind? Maybe the Jollibee bee, the San Miguel logo, or the Nike swoosh. These aren’t just nice designs—they’re trademarks. They help customers instantly recognize where a product comes from, and they protect businesses from copycats.
In the Philippines, trademarks and service marks fall under intellectual property rights and are regulated by the Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines (IPOPHL) through the Intellectual Property Code (RA 8293).
A trademark is basically your brand’s identity for goods. It can be a word, logo, symbol, slogan, or even a combination of these that sets your product apart from the rest. For example, when you see the “Oishi” logo, you immediately know the snack’s origin—that’s trademark power at work.
Once registered with IPOPHL, you have the exclusive right to use that mark. It also means you can stop others from selling products that try to imitate your brand.
📌 Real Case: In Zuneca Pharmaceutical vs. Natrapharm (2020), the Supreme Court ruled that even a registered mark can be invalidated if it causes confusion with an earlier, well-known brand. This shows how crucial IPOPHL’s role is in making sure consumers aren’t misled and businesses are treated fairly.
If a trademark covers goods, a service mark covers services. Think Cebu Pacific for airline travel or PLDT for telecommunications. Both are protected in the same way trademarks are—it’s just that instead of identifying physical products, they identify the provider of a service.
Under Philippine law, trademarks and service marks go through the same registration process. The only difference lies in what they protect.
Here’s the simplified process:
Sometimes, a design like a logo is automatically protected by copyright law the moment it’s created. But copyright only protects the design as an artistic work—it doesn’t stop others from using a similar logo for business. Registering it as a trademark or service mark gives you that commercial exclusivity.
Registering with IPOPHL gives you:
📌 Real Case: In Shang Properties Realty vs. St. Francis Development Corp. (2013), the Supreme Court emphasized that registration creates a presumption of ownership. But they also reminded brand owners: continuous use is key. A registered mark can still be cancelled if you don’t actually use it.