Trademark Fair Use in the Philippines: Examining Precedents and Limitations

In today’s fast-moving and competitive world, your brand is often your biggest asset. A trademark isn’t just a logo or a name—it’s your business identity. It tells customers who you are and sets you apart from the competition. But here’s the catch: owning a trademark doesn’t mean you can stop everyone else from ever using it.

There are certain situations where the law allows others to use your mark without asking for permission. This concept is called trademark fair use, and it’s something every business owner in the Philippines should understand.

What Exactly Is Trademark Fair Use?

Simply put, fair use means that someone can use another person’s trademark in limited ways without it being considered infringement. The law recognizes that sometimes, using a brand name is necessary—either to describe something truthfully or to identify a product.

Fair use generally falls into two categories:

1. Descriptive Fair Use

This happens when a trademark is used just to describe a product or service accurately. For example, if your software works on Microsoft Windows, you can mention “compatible with Microsoft Windows.” You’re not pretending to be Microsoft—you’re simply telling people the truth.

2. Nominative Fair Use

This type allows you to use a trademark to refer directly to the brand or its products. A good example is comparative advertising. Say a blog compares Toyota and Honda cars—you need to use their names to make the comparison clear. As long as you don’t mislead people into thinking Toyota or Honda endorsed the blog, this is fine.

How Does Fair Use Work in the Philippines?

Here in the Philippines, the Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines (IPOPHL) recognizes fair use as a limit on trademark rights. Our courts have also clarified its boundaries in real cases.

The Big Case: McDonald’s vs. Big Mak

One of the most famous trademark battles in the country is McDonald’s Corporation v. L.C. Big Mak Burger, Inc. McDonald’s claimed that “Big Mak” was too similar to its iconic “Big Mac” and sued a local fast-food chain for infringement.

The Supreme Court sided with McDonald’s. Why? Because the name “Big Mak” was close enough to “Big Mac” that people might believe the products were related. The Court explained that the real test in infringement cases is whether consumers are likely to be confused—not just whether the names look or sound alike.

This ruling made it clear that you can’t hide behind “fair use” if what you’re doing is likely to trick people into thinking your business is connected to someone else’s brand.

When Fair Use Doesn’t Apply

Even though fair use exists, it comes with clear limits:

• If it confuses consumers, it’s not fair use. The moment people think your product is associated with another brand, you’ve crossed the line.
• If you’re trying to profit from someone else’s reputation, it’s not fair use. For instance, slapping “Nike” on cleaning products to attract buyers will almost certainly be infringement.
• If it dilutes a famous trademark, it’s not fair use. Even without confusion, famous brands are protected against uses that weaken their uniqueness.
• Non-commercial uses (like parody, commentary, or news) may be safer, but they still can’t damage the original brand’s reputation.

How Copyright Fits In

It’s also worth remembering that many trademarks—like logos or packaging designs—can also be protected under copyright. So if someone copies your logo, you may be able to take action both for trademark infringement and copyright violation. IPOPHL enforces both rights, depending on the situation.

So, What Should Businesses Do?

Fair use sounds simple in theory, but in practice, it can be tricky. If you’re thinking about using another brand’s trademark, here are a few tips:

• Check your intent. Are you using the mark to describe something honestly, or are you trying to ride on another brand’s popularity?
• Avoid misleading consumers. If there’s any chance people will think you’re affiliated with the brand, stop.
• Get advice. IPOPHL has clear rules, but every case is different. Talking to an IP lawyer before making a move can save you a lot of trouble later.

Final Thoughts

Trademark fair use is all about balance. It protects brand owners from unfair competition while still allowing others to use marks for legitimate reasons like description, comparison, or commentary.

The McDonald’s v. Big Mak case shows us how seriously the courts take consumer confusion. At the end of the day, if your use of a trademark might trick people into thinking there’s a connection, it’s not fair use.

If you’re a business owner in the Philippines dealing with trademark issues—or if you just want to make sure your brand is safe—don’t leave it to chance. At Brealant, we help businesses navigate IPOPHL rules and trademark law, making sure your rights are protected while avoiding costly mistakes.

Your brand is your identity. Protect it wisely.

‍