April 29, 2025

What’s in a Name? The Battle for the ‘Eat Bulaga!’ Trademark

What’s in a Name? The Battle for the ‘Eat Bulaga!’ TrademarkBlog empty image

In entertainment, a name can be everything. It carries the brand, sparks memories, and builds a bond with the audience. In the Philippines, few names are as iconic as “Eat Bulaga!”. For more than four decades, this noontime variety show has been part of daily life—filling living rooms with laughter, contests, and unforgettable TV moments.

But behind the smiles and jokes, a serious legal fight has been unfolding. At the heart of it? Ownership of the “Eat Bulaga!” name.

The Rise of a Filipino Classic

When Eat Bulaga! first aired on July 30, 1979, nobody could have predicted it would last this long. With its mix of comedy, games, and talent showcases, it became more than just a program—it turned into a cultural institution.

Segments like Juan for All, All for Juan, Pinoy Henyo, and Kalyeserye became household favorites. And of course, the trio of Tito Sotto, Vic Sotto, and Joey de Leon—or “TVJ”—turned into legends themselves.

But success also brings challenges. And in 2019, a dispute erupted over who really owns the rights to the show’s name.

The Trademark Dispute

The production company TAPE Inc., which has managed Eat Bulaga! since its beginning, insists it has the rightful claim to the trademark. They’ve been using it since day one and have also secured formal registrations with the Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines (IPOPHL).

But another group stepped forward, claiming that they had registered “Eat Bulaga!” back in the 1980s for business purposes. They argued that TAPE had no authority to use the name without their consent.

Things got even more complicated when TVJ themselves filed trademark applications for “Eat Bulaga!” only in 2023—decades after TAPE had already done so.

This is where the first-to-file rule of IPOPHL comes into play. In simple terms, it doesn’t matter who used a name first—it matters who registered it first. This rule has been decisive in many disputes, and it’s at the core of the Eat Bulaga! battle.

Trademark vs. Copyright: What’s the Difference?

To understand the fight, we need to clear up two key concepts:

  • Trademarks protect names, logos, and symbols that identify a brand. They must be renewed every 10 years, and owners must prove that the mark is actively used by filing a Declaration of Actual Use (DAU).
  • Copyrights protect original creative works—like scripts, songs, TV episodes, or artwork. Copyright in the Philippines lasts for the creator’s lifetime plus 50 years, and it exists automatically once the work is created.

So in Eat Bulaga!’s case, the name is covered by trademark law, while the episodes and creative content fall under copyright.

A Real-Life Lesson from Case Law

The Supreme Court’s decision in Joaquin v. Drilon (1999) helps put this in perspective. The case involved two dating shows, Rhoda and Me and It’s a Date. The Court ruled that the creators of Rhoda and Me had copyright protection for their actual recordings, but not for the idea of having a dating show.

This ruling shows that while you can protect your creative expression, you can’t lock down broad ideas. Applied to Eat Bulaga!, this means the show’s title and branding can be trademarked, but the general concept of a noontime game-and-comedy show is not something anyone can exclusively own.

How IPOPHL Handles Trademark Battles

Registering a trademark in the Philippines isn’t just about filling out a form. It goes through several stages:

  1. Filing the application – The applicant submits the mark, list of goods or services, and pays the fee.
  2. Examination – IPOPHL checks if the mark is unique and complies with the law.
  3. Publication – The mark is published in the IPO Gazette, giving others a chance to oppose it.
  4. Opposition – If someone believes the mark shouldn’t be registered (like TVJ challenging TAPE), they can file a case before the Bureau of Legal Affairs (BLA).
  5. Decision and Appeals – If opposition is granted, registration may be cancelled. Appeals can go all the way up to the Court of Appeals or even the Supreme Court.

This process can take months, even years, showing how complicated and high-stakes trademark disputes can get.

What the Eat Bulaga! Case Teaches Us

Three big takeaways stand out:

  1. Don’t Delay Filing – Waiting too long to register a name leaves room for others to claim it.
  2. Keep Using It – A trademark isn’t just paperwork. Owners must show actual use through a DAU to keep it alive.
  3. Know the Limits – Copyright and trademark complement each other, but they protect different things.

Final Thoughts

The fight over Eat Bulaga! isn’t just about a name—it’s about legacy, identity, and business. For fans, the show will always be about fun and laughter. But for lawyers and producers, it’s a reminder that intellectual property rights must be secured early and carefully.

The IPOPHL process, with its checks, oppositions, and appeals, ensures that trademark ownership is not just handed over lightly. And for creators and businesses, this case is a valuable lesson: protect your brand before someone else does.